“On January 8, 1989 the German branch of the Fusion Energy Foundation held one of a series of seminars, devoted to the geometrical method in physics and biology. Present at the seminar was Lyndon H. LaRouche, who recently initiated an exciting new line of investigation in this field. LaRouche’s recent work centered on the hypothesis, that the so-called “strong forces” of nuclear physics derive from a negative curvature characteristic in the geometry of physical space-time.”
LYNDON LAROUCHE SEMINAR ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF NEGATIVE CURVATURE FOR PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY
Nice ! Thanks for making this intramural document available for more public perusal. I’ve seen numerous references to LaRouche’s work with Moon, generally as captions on photographs republished in Fidelio or EIR, but am pretty sure I’ve not seen a nitty-gritty treatment of their actual collaboration. Not sure I comprehend most of it, but truly the most challenging and detailed account I’ve seen coming out of this FEF period. Illustrations might be helpful. Links to the reference to Leibniz curvatures also …. Who is the writer, CBS?
Glad you appreciate these more in depth questions. Most of our members are very happy that such “Internal” material can also be made public after so many years. The understanding of negative curvature is crucial for creating a New Renaissance today, especially by recovering the spirit of Brunelleschi, Cusa, and Leonardo as Lyn emphasized. As for the links to Leibniz, you can go to my Constructive Geometry section and find some of them there.
The point, however, is that you don’t need the “Internal” information to figure this out. All you need is to do the homework, yourself, as I have done with the Leibniz stuff on the Inversion of Tangents Principle, and you will see that this whole business of least action negative curvature is perfectly constructible. Just avoid Cauchy’s nonesense.
What is essential, however, is to follow through Lyn’s breakthrough of 1981 and workout, rigorously, the three axiom busting principles that I have been advocating all along; that is, constructive least action geometry, time reversal, and Bach Lydian axiom busting. The rest will fall into place in time.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to get the illustrations, yet. CBS is Chuck Stevens.