THE ANTI-ENTROPIC SECRET BEHIND TUTANKHAMUN’S TOMB

When I started investigating the nature of God, I was not thinking of religion per se. I was interested in finding out the qualities that I would have to have if I were Him.  So, almost immediately, the first idea that came to me was that God must be exactly the opposite of an oligarch; that is, He must be personally truthful and just to mankind.

Next, the second idea that came to me was that God has to be the uncaused principle of everything that changes in the Universe. So, in that sense, he could not, Himself, be created, because He would have to submit to change. The problem is: How can such a cause be represented as an idea?

And, finally, the third idea that came to me was that God had to be merciful, because the word “miséricordieux” in French had the name of God included in it. Truthful, Creative, and Merciful, those are the reasons why I also think man can become God-like. But, how can the human mind construct a concept of that likeness? And, the answer to that came to me when I realized that the idea could not be a pairwise relationship, but a triply-connected process.

THE ANTI-ENTROPIC SECRET BEHIND TUTANKHAMUN’S TOMB

 

IN MEMORY OF ACADEMICIAN MIKHAIL TITARENKO by Rachel Douglas

“Academician Mikhaïl Titarenko, who died at the age of 81 after a lengthy illness, headed the Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IFES RAS) from 1985 until last year. Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche wrote in a message of condolence to the late academician’s colleagues, ‘If the world will be pulled back from the abyss and a new paradigm will bring about a new chapter in human history, it will be thanks to the strategic alliance between Russia and China, and Mikhail Titarenko has probably contributed more than anyone else for it to come into being. Titarenko was,’ Zepp-LaRouche continued, ‘the perfect example, of why the study and knowledge of other cultures is the basis for peace.'”

IN MEMORY OF ACADEMICIAN MIKHAIL TITARENKO
by Rachel Douglas

 

THE SOLFEGE TORUS

Although everything seems to indicate that the geometry of the solfège torus might be a useful means of understanding the dynamics of physical-space time, beware of the multitude of online blogs which have twisted this geometry into mystical mumbo-jumbo. The point is not to describe some visual experience of black-holes for the purpose of harnessing some incomprehensible energy, or to discover some look-alike model of atomic or molecular structure to titillate your sense perception appetites. The point is to discover how God’s solfège applies to the human mind and to the galaxy as a whole. Does this mean the question is theological?

THE SOLFEGE TORUS

 

WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE FUTURE

We have entered into a terrible period of history where the speed of light has been slowing down because of the increased density of stupidity around the world. We have to change that situation.

The time has come to change the state of human affairs and one of the best ways to do it is to return to the discoveries of the Pythagorean Theorem and of doubling the square as in Plato’s Meno dialogue.

WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE FUTURE

AL-MASUDI’S UNIVERSAL HISTORY: A DIALOGUE OF CIVILIZATIONS

Like in all world conquering movements in history, the Islamic followers of Mohammed developed, from the 8th century to the 13th century, two tendencies that had two opposite effects on the world as a whole, one was an all-exclusive imperial tendency to impose their beliefs on the world, and the other was an all-inclusive movement of collaboration among different religions and peoples for the purpose of creating a universal dialogue of civilizations.

AL-MASUDI’S UNIVERSAL HISTORY: A DIALOGUE OF CIVILIZATIONS