Category Archives: Posts

The difficulty in understanding the historical significance of Joan of Arc comes from the difficulty in understanding the nature of her miracle, which is: ANNOUNCING AND ACCOMPLISHING THE CHANGE AT THE SAME TIME. This is what the book of Gabriel Hanotaux, JEANNE D’ARC is uniquely capable of giving the reader the ability to grasp, when he understands the performative nature of the coincidence between her first meeting with Charles VII and the Pilgrimage of the Annunciation at Le Puy on Mach 25, 1429.

The key to understanding Joan of Arc is located in realizing that the purpose of her mission was the reconstruction of humanity in the simultaneity of eternity; that is to say, in discovering that such a miracle of transformation had to pass through the historical reconstruction of Charlemagne’s Unity of Europe: a Europe without religious divisions, a Europe without geopolitical tensions, a Europe without competitive nationalistic and oligarchical interests; in one word, a Europe entirely based on the principle of changing mankind through the benefit of the other.

Hanotaux’s book also makes you discover that if France had been taken over by the English, if during the short period of three years of Joan of Arc’s mission, it had been partitioned between England and the German controlled Burgundy, not only would France have been completely destroyed, but Christianity and Western Civilization as a whole would have also been eradicated from the surface of the Earth.

THE AXIOMATIC CHANGE OF JOAN OF ARC ACCORDING TO GABRIEL HANOTAUX

Benjamin Banneker was an African-American inventor, poet, mathematician, and astronomer mostly known for having designed the plan of the city of Washington DC with the French architect, Pierre L’Enfant, under the supervision of George Washington.

What is little known about him, however, is the fact that he had made the fundamental Leibnizian discovery that the principle of proportionality between reason and power was congruent with arithmetic, politics, and the Peace of Westphalia.

BENJAMIN BANNEKER: PROPORTIONALITY AND THE BENEFIT OF THE OTHER

Schiller said that beauty was essential to life because it is the fundamental characteristic of a moral human being. Why is that the case? Because what is good is also what is beautiful, and what is beautiful is also what is true. As Leibniz discovered:

“All beauty consists in a harmony and proportion; the beauty of minds, or of creatures who possess reason, is a proportion between reason and power, which in this life is also the foundation of the justice, the order, and the merits and even the form of the Republic, that each may understand what he is capable, and capable as much as he understands.” (Quoted from The Political Economy of the American Revolution, EIR, 1995, p. 215.)

WHY IS BEAUTY BEAUTIFUL?

This report investigates the paradox of Homoousios and of the Filioque of the Charlemagne Creed as the means of eliminating the lies of the fake news about war. Once that problem is understood and solved, one might hope that mankind will stop repeating the mistakes of past history.

Since the Filioque question has been the object of the most significant controversy between Eastern and Western Christianity, the time has now come to properly understand and solve such a paradox in order to be able to reach out for a peaceful relationship with Russia and assure the victory of the win-win policy of Xi Jinping.

The point is that the Filioque has to be taken out of its narrow religious context and be adopted as an epistemological mean of securing peace and development for the world. How do you do that? The key is to understand the significance of what Lyndon LaRouche means by a triply-connected Riemannian manifold and apply it to a New Peace of Westphalia for the whole planet.

OLIGARCHISM VS REPUBLICANISM

The understanding of the unity of our multifaceted world is the most important and most difficult challenge in capturing how the universe works as a whole.

The reason this is the case is because a transfinite matterofmind conception is required in order to understand how the universe expands. This means that we must not only eliminate the failed epistemological notions of discreteness and linearity from our habits of thinking, but that we must also eliminate the epistemologically flawed notions of believing that things are made up of points and holes.

As Lyn demonstrated, this change in our view of the universe is aimed at representing the reality of the fact that “knowledge is a unity;” which means that the truth about the human mind is that it must follow the principles which underlie the fabric of the physical universe itself and, therefore, must reflect the unity of such a transfinite principle as a true knowledge of the One and the Many that emerges from Plato’s Cave.

The implication, here, is that this unity of knowledge must be reflected in such a manner that each facet of change in the universe is present and resonates, isochronically, in every other facet of change, like a transfinite series of nested manifolds; and the truth of it cannot be expressed outside of that multifaceted quality of the universe as a whole.

A TRANSFINITE AND EXPANDING UNIVERSE