LYNDON LAROUCHE, THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, 1987

Here is another little gem from Lyn. This 1987 memorandum on Dr. Sydney Webb’s work in biophysics is an axiom buster of the first order. It is the best report I have ever read on Lyn’s original discovery of the least action principle and on the fallacy of composition of the deductive method. Enjoy.

LYNDON LAROUCHE, THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, 1987

 

REMBRANDT: THE DENIAL OF PETER

THE SECRET OF HUMAN CREATIVITY

All four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John have reported on the prediction that Jesus made during the Last Supper, stating that Peter would disown him three times before the night was over, and all four mentioned the event of that denial in one form or another. If ever there was a religious subject that was made popular for painters in the Netherlands during the first half of the seventeenth century, it was the denial of Peter. More than twenty European artists of that period, most of them were Dutch, chose to depict the famous biblical scene, but none of them touched on the subject in the profound axiomatic manner that Rembrandt did.

Rembrandt chose to go against the public opinion view of Peter’s denial and addressed the fundamental issue of the axiomatic change that takes place in the mind of an individual at the moment when he is confronted with the truth of having to risk his own life for the benefit of another. This report has three sections:

  1. THE STORY OF THE NIGHT WHEN PETER’S LIFE WAS CHANGED
  2. THE TURBULENT SENSUAL NOISE BEHIND THE DIFFERENT POPULAR PAINTINGS OF PETER’S DENIAL
  3. THE REMBRANT AXIOMATIC SETTING FOR THE DENIAL OF PETER

REMBRANDT, THE DENIAL OF PETER

 

KEPLER’S SOLUTION TO THE CREATIVE PROCESS

Twenty-nine years ago on his birthday, September 8, 1987, Lyndon LaRouche wrote an internal memorandum called: THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, in response to some questions that Dr. Sidney J. Webb, M.D., had posed with respect to his research on “Nonlinear Phenomena in Bioenergetics and Oncology.”

A month later, on October 16, 1987, Dr. Wolfgang Lillge, M. D. wrote an article on the same subject in EIR, in which he stated: “We are still very much in the dark about what actually causes a normal cell to become a cancer cell, with all the implications that has.” The point Dr. Lillge made was that the greatest obstacle to discovering a cure for cancer had not been the lack of funding or the lack of investigators in the field of cancer research, but was located in the deductive nature of the epistemological method of scientific investigation itself.

The time has now come to reopen this investigation with a new look into how Kepler had solved this deductive problem with constructive geometry by using the LaRouche method of multiply-connected spiral action by time reversal.

KEPLER’S SOLUTION TO THE CREATIVE PROCESS

 

THE CHINESE UNITY OF 氣 QI, 理 LI, AND 太極 TAIJI IN THE SIMULTANEITY OF ETERNITY

In the book of The Great Learning, the Confucian sage, Zhu Xi, brings together three discoveries of principles which form the essential actions of the creative process of the human mind. These three principles are the Principle of Qi (Power), the Principle of Li (Reason), and the Principle of 太極 Taiji (Ultimate End). The congruence of these three principles works like the principle of the Peace of Westphalia.

When these three principles are brought together congruently, among three different minds of completely different cultures, they confirm the nature of Lyndon LaRouche’s anti-entropic principle of increase-in-energy-flux-density; otherwise the relationship is entropic.

This report shows how such a discovery is expressed in Chinese artistic composition through a unique curvature of laughter which takes the characteristic of an isochronic surface of negative curvature; that is to say, a surface whose curvature admits of different rates of change to come together in the simultaneity of eternity.

THE CHINESE UNITY OF QI, LI, AND TAIJI IN THE SIMULTANEITY OF ETERNITY

LAROUCHE IS THE FLY IN THE OINTMENT

The real question behind the current American Presidential Election is: “Will the American people reject the old bankrupt geopolitical axioms of the current City of London and Wall-Street Banking System and return to the Hamiltonian National Banking policy of the traditional American System?” This is what this election is really all about, regardless of the candidates.

As the American elite will continue to push Trump to self-destruct and usher in the war-mongering Hillary Clinton, the American people will be forced to go back, by hindsight-time-reversal, to the nomination by George Washington of Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of Treasury on 9/11/1789. That is to say, a return to the future of America by the restoration of Alexander Hamilton’s policy that LaRouche has reformulated in his Four New Laws.

LAROUCHE IS THE FLY IN THE OINTMENT