Category Archives: Posts

Just a thought,

When you want to accomplish something good for mankind, do you do it out of duty or out of knowledge of what’s right? That’s the crucial question that should be posed to every American citizen during the current Presidential Campaign. Are you working from the power of ideas or from the power of guilt?

The British have devised a Kantian method of intervening in people which is to control them by pushing their guilt button or their self-interest button. That is the H. D. Wells and the Bertrand Russell method, which British Intelligence became the masters of in the early part of the Twentieth Century, and have been bullying the rest of the world with, ever since.

In other words, the British find in someone some flaw that they think can shame him and they push that button to get him to act. Such a British subject will tend to respond accordingly, that is, in accordance with public perception and, therefore, will do what they ask of him to do out of fear of being put to shame. That method is effective up to a limit where the subject either submits or discovers the flaw in the method.

When you come to that fork in the road, you have a choice; either you accept that British method as being the natural condition of man or you go beyond that apparent limitation because you have discovered that the only way to develop another human being is to have him act from the discovery of a higher knowledge of truth.

What you must do, then, is to seek out the morally fit people you wish to recruit to this new and higher idea with carefully chosen paradoxes and shock their popular accepted axioms. Use something like the very effective axiom busting sign we used to deploy at the Los Angeles Airport, during the 1970’s, and which stated:

“JANE FONDA SPREADS FASTER THAN NUCLEAR WASTE.”

The effect of such an axiom busting statement had the double benefit of keeping the environmentalists away from your literature table and of inviting over the morally thinking people; that is, at least those who had a sense of humor and still believed in scientific progress. Those are the people you want to recruit.

FIN

When I started investigating the nature of God, I was not thinking of religion per se. I was interested in finding out the qualities that I would have to have if I were Him.  So, almost immediately, the first idea that came to me was that God must be exactly the opposite of an oligarch; that is, He must be personally truthful and just to mankind.

Next, the second idea that came to me was that God has to be the uncaused principle of everything that changes in the Universe. So, in that sense, he could not, Himself, be created, because He would have to submit to change. The problem is: How can such a cause be represented as an idea?

And, finally, the third idea that came to me was that God had to be merciful, because the word “miséricordieux” in French had the name of God included in it. Truthful, Creative, and Merciful, those are the reasons why I also think man can become God-like. But, how can the human mind construct a concept of that likeness? And, the answer to that came to me when I realized that the idea could not be a pairwise relationship, but a triply-connected process.

THE ANTI-ENTROPIC SECRET BEHIND TUTANKHAMUN’S TOMB

“Academician Mikhaïl Titarenko, who died at the age of 81 after a lengthy illness, headed the Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IFES RAS) from 1985 until last year. Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche wrote in a message of condolence to the late academician’s colleagues, ‘If the world will be pulled back from the abyss and a new paradigm will bring about a new chapter in human history, it will be thanks to the strategic alliance between Russia and China, and Mikhail Titarenko has probably contributed more than anyone else for it to come into being. Titarenko was,’ Zepp-LaRouche continued, ‘the perfect example, of why the study and knowledge of other cultures is the basis for peace.'”

IN MEMORY OF ACADEMICIAN MIKHAIL TITARENKO
by Rachel Douglas

Although everything seems to indicate that the geometry of the solfège torus might be a useful means of understanding the dynamics of physical-space time, beware of the multitude of online blogs which have twisted this geometry into mystical mumbo-jumbo. The point is not to describe some visual experience of black-holes for the purpose of harnessing some incomprehensible energy, or to discover some look-alike model of atomic or molecular structure to titillate your sense perception appetites. The point is to discover how God’s solfège applies to the human mind and to the galaxy as a whole. Does this mean the question is theological?

THE SOLFEGE TORUS

We have entered into a terrible period of history where the speed of light has been slowing down because of the increased density of stupidity around the world. We have to change that situation.

The time has come to change the state of human affairs and one of the best ways to do it is to return to the discoveries of the Pythagorean Theorem and of doubling the square as in Plato’s Meno dialogue.

WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE FUTURE