THE FILIOQUE: THINKING FROM A FUTURE ORIENTED AND TOROIDAL UNIVERSE

THE_FILIOQUE_THINKING_FROM_A_FUTURE_ORIENTED_AND_TOROIDAL_UNIVERSE

In statesmanship, the question of the Filioque (“and from the Son”) comes in historically, as a principle of economics as, for instance, under Charlemagne (747-814), four centuries after the First Council of Nicaea (325-381 AD), where it was first introduced as a religious article of faith. However, the key to solving the paradox of homoousios (“of the same substance”) implied in the concept of the Filioque is not to address the matter as a religious question, but to solve the epistemological and political problem it poses to the mind, as, for instance, represented in the conflict between Plato and Aristotle. The Filioque is the main axiomatic problem which historically has divided the East from the West.

GENERATING THE FIVE PLATONIC SOLIDS WITH NICHOLAS OF CUSA’S METHOD OF FOLDING, UNFOLDING, AND ENFOLDING

GENERATING_THE_FIVE_PLATONIC_SOLIDS_WITH_NICHOLAS_OF_CUSAS_METHOD_OF_FOLDING_UNFOLDING_AND_ENFOLDING

There is a Nicholas of Cusa method for generating the five Platonic solids by way of folding, unfolding, and enfolding. And, you don’t need a compass, a straight edge, or any mathematical calculation to do the work. All you need to do is to wave your hands around like a chorus director. I like to call this the ironic waving around a knotty Divine Proportion, because it causes you to be creative by having your mind make an axiomatic backward flip into yourself to locate a higher epistemological level; that is, into a domain which discards all simple hypothesis of circular folding and takes you into the higher hypothesis of continuous doubly-connected circular action.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

LEONARDO AND RAPHAEL: A PEDAGOGICAL ON LINEAR PERSPECTIVE AND THE GOLDEN SECTION OF DIVINE PROPORTION

https://www.amatterofmind.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/LEONARDO_AND_RAPHAEL_A_PEDAGOGICAL_ON_LINEAR_PERSPECTIVE_AND_THE_GOLDEN_SECTION_OF_DIVINE_PROPORTION-1.pdf

MERRY CHRISTMAS AND DONA NOBIS PACEM

The purpose of this report is to show how to create something as opposed to producing an effect; that is, to create the causal process for an effect to be produced as a thoughtful or beautiful object. That was the method of Leonardo Da Vinci and of Raphael Sanzio who both painted objects as if they were “beautiful.” However, what was actually beautiful was not the objects they painted as such, but the process by means of which they showed how to make those objects appear to be “beautiful.” What is beautiful about artistic composition is not the effect, but the cause of that effect. This is the difference that the Divine Proportion makes.

RESTORING THE CHRISTIAN IDEA AND PRACTICE OF SHARING AGAPES

RESTORING_THE_CHRISTIAN_IDEA_AND_PRACTICE_OF_SHARING_AGAPES

In regards to what Lyndon LaRouche wrote about agape in his book review It’s All About Us, in the EIR of November 11, 2022, I consider it important to remind readers that the first Christian apostolic community had a practice that was known as sharing their “agapes” or their “feasts of love” with their enemy.