One of the most difficult aspects of examining an axiomatic change is finding the appropriate visual pedagogical material for it. For example, it is very difficult to capture change as the principle of time because once you have captured it, it is no longer changing. As a result, representing time as change always carries with it the inversion of the Heraclitus irony that everything changes except change itself.
The means that scientists have used for showing the “visible” characteristics of change have generally been fallacies of composition, especially in their more recent attempts at illustrating Einstein’s curvature of space-time with his hypothesis of gravitational waves. I am introducing here a new hypothesis which may shock some of you but which can justify its validity by construction only: “Change is the curvature of time because time is the curvature of change.”
In a report written in 1986 titled: TRUTH IS BEAUTY AND BEAUTY IS TRUTH: UNDERSTANDING THE SCIENCE OF MUSIC,and now recently published by EIR, Lyndon LaRouche identified that it is the anti-entropic principle of the creative process of the human mind, connecting both the domains of physics and of artistic composition, which is necessary to internalize in order to overcome past axiomatic failures and avoid future human catastrophes.
THOUGHTS ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT AN AXIOMATIC CHANGE
